1. A research analyst for the Indiana Department of Corrections was told that she would have to submit to a psychological examination in order to keep her job. She took the exam, which lasted two hours and contained many questions related to details of her personal life. She sued, claiming that the test violated her constitutional rights. What should the court decide (your opinion)? Why? After writing your initial thoughts, use the Internet to look up the case. What was the actual decision and why? (Greenawalt v. Indiana Department of Corrections, 397 F.3d 587 [7th Cir. 2005
2. Hoffman v Caterpillar,
What were the 2 legal issues in this case? What did the court decide? For each issue try to write using a brief version of the IRAC (Issue-Rule-Application-Conclusion) method s. There will be two IRAC analyses, one for each issue. Ensure that the issues are covered adequately. what do you think will be the final outcome of this case? Was it decided fairly in your opinion? Why or why not?
Each question 200 word min, the first question should be APA style.